Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Poll: Mexicans Say Amnesty Would Increase Illegal Immigration

Mexicans also Feel Mexican-Americans Should Be Loyal to Mexico

WASHINGTON (October 14, 2009) – A new survey by Zogby International finds that people in Mexico think that granting legal status to illegal immigrants would encourage more illegal immigration to the United States. As the top immigrant-sending country for both legal and illegal immigrants, views on immigration in Mexico can provide insight into the likely impact of an amnesty, as well as other questions related to immigration.

The results are available online at the Center for Immigration Studies' website. Among the findings:
  • A clear majority of people in Mexico, 56 percent, thought giving legal status to illegal immigrants in the United States would make it more likely that people they know would go to the United States illegally. Just 17 percent thought it would make Mexicans less likely to go illegally. The rest were unsure or thought it would make no difference.

  • Of Mexicans with a member of their immediate household in the United States, 65 percent said a legalization program would make people they know more likely to go to America illegally.

  • Two-thirds of Mexicans know someone living in the United States; one-third said an immediate member of their household was living in the United States.

  • Interest in going to the United States remains strong even in the current recession, with 36 percent of Mexicans (39 million people) saying they would move to the United States if they could. This is consistent with a recent Pew Research Center poll which found that about one-third of Mexicans would go to the United States if they could. At present, 12 to 13 million Mexico-born people live in the United States.

  • An overwhelming majority (69 percent) thought that the primary loyalty of Mexican-Americans (Mexico- and U.S.-born) should be to Mexico. Just 20 percent said it should be to the United States. The rest were unsure.

  • Also, 69 percent of people in Mexico felt that the Mexican government should represent the interests of Mexican-Americans (Mexico- and U.S.-born) in the United States.

  • A plurality, 39 percent, of Mexicans thought that in the last year fewer people they know had gone to the United States as illegal immigrants compared to previous years. Only 27 percent thought more had gone. The rest thought it had stayed the same or were unsure.

  • A plurality, 40 percent, also thought that in the last year more of the illegal immigrants they know had returned to Mexico compared to previous years. Only 25 percent thought the number returning had fallen. The rest thought it had stayed the same or were unsure.

  • Both the bad economy and increased immigration enforcement were cited as reasons fewer people were going to America as illegal immigrants and more were coming back to Mexico.

Discusssion: As the nation begins debates the issue of immigration, the perspective of people in Mexico is important because Mexico is the top sending country for both legal and illegal immigrants. In 2008 one of six new legal immigrants was from Mexico and, according to the Department of Homeland Security, 6 out of 10 illegal immigrants come from that country. Asking people in Mexico their views on immigration can provide insight into the likely impact of an amnesty for illegal immigrants and other questions related to immigration.

This survey is the first to ask people in Mexico if they thought legalizing illegal immigrants in the United States would encourage more illegal immigration. The survey was conducted in August and September of 2009 and consisted of 1,004 in-person interviews of adults throughout Mexico. The findings show that a majority of people in Mexico think that an amnesty would make it more likely that people in Mexico would come to the United States illegally. This is especially true for people who have a member of their households living in the United States. It is important to note that respondents were asked specifically about whether an amnesty would make illegal immigration more likely, not just immigration generally. Other questions in the survey explore attitudes about migration to United States generally, recent trends in migration, and loyalty to the United States.

The results may give pause to those lawmakers who think that an amnesty/legalization for illegals immigrants would reduce illegal immigration in the future. The findings of this survey indicate that an amnesty would encourage more illegal immigration, at least from Mexico.

Methodology: The in-person survey done in Mexico for the Center for Immigration Studies by Zogby International was of 1,004 persons 18 years of age and older. The sampling framework was the most recent (2009) electoral sections defined by the Federal Electoral Institute. A multi-stage sampling procedure was employed that first randomly selected 100 electoral sections proportional to size. Second, two house blocks were randomly selected from each section. Within each block five households were selected using a systematic random procedure. The margin of error for the entire sample is +/- 3.1% for a 95% confidence level. Margins of error are larger for sub-groups.

# # #

The Center for Immigration Studies is an independent research institute that examines the impact of immigration on the United States

El bloqueo a Cuba, una violación al derecho internacional

Por Ariel Cardoso

La Comisión de Relaciones Internacionales de la Asamblea Nacional del Poder Popular hizo un llamado a otros parlamentos a oponerse a esa política genocida Recientemente la administración norteamericana ratificó la vigencia de las sanciones económicas contra nuestro país, muchas de las cuales obstaculizaron el comercio con otras naciones Autor:

Un llamamiento de Cuba a todos los parlamentos del mundo para poner fin al bloqueo económico, comercial y financiero impuesto a la Isla por el gobierno de Estados Unidos fue dado a conocer este lunes en una Audiencia Pública de la Comisión de Relaciones Internacionales de la Asamblea Nacional del Poder Popular.

Bajo la premisa de que el bloqueo es ante todo una violación al derecho internacional y una amenaza a la seguridad y a la vida de un pueblo entero, diputados y funcionarios de organismos centrales de la administración del Estado denunciaron la continuidad de esta política, que hasta diciembre de 2008 había provocado una afectación que supera los 96 mil millones de dólares, o más de 236 mil millones según los precios actuales de la moneda.

Abelardo Moreno, vicecanciller cubano, condenó la posición del actual gobierno norteamericano, el cual muestra una falsa imagen de benevolencia cuando en realidad poco ha cambiado el bloqueo desde que en enero de 2009 asumiera la presidencia Barack Obama.

Las evidencias demuestran que durante el presente año han continuado las persecuciones a empresas y compañías extranjeras que tienen o quieren desarrollar negocios con Cuba. Las autoridades norteamericanas han mantenido la presión a las transferencias bancarias, mientras que la Isla sigue siendo el único lugar al que los ciudadanos estadounidenses no pueden viajar libremente.

Estas agresiones no han afectado solo nuestras relaciones con otros países o la propia economía nacional, sino que perturban a diario la vida de los más de 11 millones de cubanos que han conquistado su soberanía a fuerza de trabajo y sacrificio.


Análisis a Fondo: La guerra sucia continuará; le conviene a Washington

Foto proporcionada por el autor. No lo dejaran gobernar, le dije a Olivia en el 2019   Ahora lo acusan de ser financiado por los narcos ...