At least 138 people deported from the United States to El Salvador since
2013 have been killed, according to a new report by Human Rights Watch, which investigates
human rights abuses worldwide.
The 117-page report also says researchers identified at least 70
deportees who were sexually assaulted, tortured or kidnapped. Many victims
were asylum-seekers attacked or killed by the gangs they originally fled.
The findings show that “the U.S. is repeatedly violating its obligations
to protect Salvadorans from return to serious risk of harm,” Human Rights Watch
says.
The group used court records, police reports, interviews with victims
and their families and news articles to document the fates of deportees. It is
the first systematic effort to find out what happened to Salvadorans whose
asylum claims were rejected in U.S. immigration courts because they failed to
demonstrate “credible fear” of violence in El Salvador.
International asylum laws created after the Holocaust require countries to take in people
who are persecuted for their race, religion, nationality, membership of a
particular social group or political opinion.
El Salvador has one of the world’s highest homicide rates. It is one of the main sources
of migration to the U.S.
As part of its immigration crackdown, the Trump administration in September signed an agreement with
El Salvador requiring the Central American country to keep asylum seekers there
while they await the results of their asylum claims.
But the murders of 138 deportees belie any notion that El Salvador can protect citizens who are under
threat.
Roots of impunity
Roughly the size of New Jersey, El Salvador is densely populated and
highly connected by cellphone service and social media. The vulnerable groups protected under international asylum law cannot easily go
under the radar or relocate if targeted by gangs, corrupt police or domestic
abusers.
Hundreds of Salvadorans are killed every month. Murders, disappearances
and tortures almost always go unsolved in El Salvador. Criminals, especially those
with access to power, are rarely punished for their wrongdoing.
I have documented this culture of impunity across Central
America and Mexico, focusing on the indigenous people, women and political
dissidents who are so often victims of political violence.
This violence dates back centuries, to Spain’s bloody conquest of the
Americas. As in the U.S., colonial-era brutality has lasting impacts on the
region’s race, class and gender divisions.
In 1932, the massacre of indigenous Salvadorans and leftists who
rebelled against dictator Maximiliano Hernández Martínez left between 10,000 and 30,000 dead.
Communist Party member Farabundo Martí, who led Salvadoran peasant
farmers in their revolt against political corruption and unjust resource allocation, was
assassinated after the massacre. But the struggle continued.
By the 1970s, dissident factions again organized against state
oppression. United as the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front, these
groups eventually waged war on the ruling ARENA party, which they blamed for
oppressing the Salvadoran working class.
The subsequent Salvadoran civil war killed 75,000 people. In 1992, with
intensive military support from the United States, ARENA defeated the
rebels.
The 1992 El Salvador peace accords, overseen by the United Nations,
were meant to bring national reconciliation. A truth commission documented
widespread human rights abuses committed by state and paramilitary forces during
the war. But days after the report was released, in 1993, El Salvador’s ARENA-controlled
congress passed an amnesty law that excused most government and military
officials.
As a result, the root causes of El Salvador’s conflict – particularly,
unequal access to insufficient resources – still plague society. So does
the very weak rule of law that allowed civil war criminals to
go unpunished.
Neither the rightist or leftist governments that have held power since
have managed to change this.
El Salvador’s defense minister recently assessed that there are
more gang members than soldiers in his country. Police in El
Salvador are extremely aggressive in pursuing them, and civilians can get caught in the crossfire, Human Rights Watch finds.
The resulting dangerous disarray sent 46,800 residents to seek asylum in the U.S. last year. Risking
the unknown violence of migration over guaranteed violence at home is, for many
Salvadorans, a logical decision.
Human security
Crime and violence in El Salvador has declined since President Nayib Bukele took office in June
2019, according to the government.
The president credits his tough-on-gangs policing with improving security in the
country. But some crime analysts say the apparent drop in homicides is
actually a manipulation of crime data. The government recently changed
how it counts murders, eliminating deaths that result from confrontation with security forces – police killings –
from the homicide category.
In any case, levels of violence in El Salvador are still among the world’s highest.
Police regularly turn a blind eye to violence by gang members, including
both MS-13 and Barrio 18 gangs, either due to corruption or concern for their own safety. As a result,
Salvadoran police frequently fail to meaningfully protect people from gang
violence.
In these circumstances, deporting Salvadoran asylum-seekers may violate
an international law called “non-refoulement.”
According to the 1954 United Nations Convention on the Status of Refugees, which
both the U.S. and El Salvador signed, states cannot expel refugees to a
territory “where his life or freedom would be threatened.”
Migrants know El Salvador can’t protect them. That, of course, is why they flee. Now the United States government has to know
that, too.
Mneesha Gellman Associate Professor of Political Science,
Emerson College
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario