By Betsey Piette
For the first time in history,
on April 20 the price of U.S. oil fell to minus $38 per barrel. This
was an almost $100 drop per barrel from January 2020 when oil was $60 per
barrel.
On April 21, oil prices fell
even further, sinking U.S. stocks to their worst loss since April 1. Treasury
yields also fell, further increasing market concerns. The negative price drop
impacts futures contracts on oil due to be delivered in May. “Futures
contracts” refers to the price of oil delivered on a later date. “Treasury
yield” is the interest percentage of return on investment in the U.S.
government’s debt obligation. “Futures contracts” refers to the price of oil
delivered on a later date.
The glut, particularly in
crude oil, is so serious that traders are finding themselves with oil reserves,
no place to put them, and few buyers. Adding to the expense, after oil has been
pumped from the ground, it needs to be stored in anticipation of future sales.
Storage facilities could hit maximum capacity within three weeks. The
alternative, shutting down oil production, risks damaging expensive drilling
equipment.
What is behind oil’s drastic
drop in price, how long will that last, and what does this historic moment
reveal about capitalist overproduction?
Giving oil away?
With very few people driving
or flying, and with factories shut down, it is anticipated that the global
demand for oil will fall to levels last seen in the mid-1990s. Currently the
anticipated price of U.S. oil to be delivered in June and July fell to $11.57
per barrel. After President Trump made new war threats against Iran on April
22, the futures price jumped to $13.78.
But if the price actually
stays negative, oil producers will be faced with the dilemma of either giving
oil away or paying someone to take it.
In a socialist world,
producers would distribute oil to countries most in need. In 2005, for example,
when IMF-debt-ridden Argentina faced a fuel shortage, socialist-leaning,
oil-producing Venezuela — facing its own shortage of milk and dairy products —
arranged a commodity exchange.
The drop in oil prices should
mean that people in the U.S. and other capitalist countries could pay less to
heat their homes or fill up their cars. But do not expect anything like that to
happen under profit-driven capitalism.
Why the drop in oil price?
Much of the blame for this
crisis has been placed on the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet the impact of
overproduction of natural gas and oil from hydraulic fracturing (fracking) was
felt long before the pandemic hit. Even before the coronavirus struck, a global
oil glut, due to overproduction, was impacting investment markets.
In early March, OPEC and
Russia agreed to lower the oil price per barrel. Both entities enjoy low
production costs that make this possible. OPEC announced it would also reduce
production. OPEC member Saudi Arabia saw a possible advantage as lower prices
were likely to hurt shale oil production in the U.S., now a major oil-export
competitor.
Russia, already hard hit by
U.S. sanctions, announced it would keep production at current levels because it
needs the revenue. With production impacted by U.S. sanctions, Russia had no
incentive to carry the burden of U.S. energy debt.
Recently over 12 of the top
oil-producing countries have agreed to limit production to between 10 million
to 15 million barrels per day, beginning in May. Yet even that was not enough
to stop the historic price plunge.
‘Sea change in economic outlook’
Much of the oil and natural
gas produced in the U.S. depends on fracking shale formations. The U.S.
production cost per barrel is considerably higher than in the major oil- and
gas-producing competitors. For well over a decade U.S. shale oil and gas relied
on two factors — steady investments from oil company giants, banks and
investment firms, and a growing global market demand for U.S. oil and gas. The
U.S. also uses sanctions against major oil exporters like Venezuela, Iran and
Russia to boost its market advantage.
From inception, fracking has
relied on deep-pocket investors willing to bet on future sales. But to cover
the cost of investments from shale gas and oil production required a return of
at least $48 per barrel. By contrast, current oil production costs in Saudi
Arabia are around $2.80 a barrel.
In April, U.S. energy giant
Halliburton, a major shale oil producer, reported a $1.1 billion first quarter
2020 loss. It has drastically reduced production costs, laid off hundreds and
furloughed thousands of workers. It expects a further decline in revenue and
profitability for the rest of 2020.
Chris Rupkey, chief financial
economist at MUFG Union Bank, has declared: “The oil market is trading as if
we’re in a new Great Depression and demand is not going to come back for not
months, but years. There has been a sea change in the economic outlook.”
(NewYork Post, April 20)
However, some oil-consuming
countries may benefit from this oil price crisis. For decades, oil importers
have paid exporters $60 to $70 per barrel or more. Currently, because of the
lack of demand, oil prices have been $27 to $30 per barrel.
So even though oil usage has
dropped recently in China and India due to COVID-19 quarantine restrictions,
the oil glut price crisis could mean billions in annual savings for India and
China.
With an uncertain future for
global production in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, this transfer of
wealth from oil-producing countries to oil-consuming countries could be an
economic and political factor for some time to come.
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario